Skip to content
khorna

Market · 2026-04-30 · 8 min read

Why Bangkok beats Phuket and Samui for foreign investors in 2026

Most foreign buyers fixate on Phuket beach villas. The 2024 to 2025 nominee-shareholder enforcement, the 30-year leasehold tenor problem, and Bangkok's structural demand pull have changed the calculus. Here is the side-by-side.

Foreign ownership · the structural difference

Bangkok condominiums allow foreigners direct freehold ownership under the Condominium Act's 49% foreign quota per building. The Chanote title deed registers in your name. You can sell, mortgage, inherit, bequeath. The mechanics are clean.

Phuket is similar for condos but the inventory most foreigners actually want · villas · runs on 30+30+30 year leasehold structures registered at the Land Department. On paper that is 90 years. In practice the renewals carry uncertainty and resale value compresses as the tenor shortens.

Koh Samui prohibits foreign-quota condos due to zoning. Foreigners are forced into 30-year leasehold villas with no guaranteed renewal mechanism.

The company-structure crackdown is the hidden risk

Thai company structures (a company holds the land, foreigner owns up to 49% of shares with Thai nominees holding the rest) were the standard workaround for Phuket and Samui villas. Since 2024 to 2025 the Land Department and Revenue Department have intensified enforcement against nominee shareholders.

Bangkok condos face zero such exposure because they are foreign-quota freehold by statute. No nominees, no company shell, no audit risk.

Demand pull · where the wealth is going

Thailand's DTV (Destination Thailand Visa, launched 2024) issued ~50,000 approvals in 2025. Around 70% settle in urban centres. The LTR (Long-Term Resident) visa targets pensioners and high-earners; ~20,000 approved by 2026 with around 60% selecting Bangkok for executive rentals and medical hubs.

Capital relocation from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore funnels around THB 150 billion annually into Thai property. Bangkok captures around 40% of this. Phuket captures ~25%, Samui ~10%.

Yield asymmetry · headline vs net

Bangkok central full-service condos deliver 5.5 to 7% net yield after 10 to 15% management drag. Appreciation 7 to 9% p.a. for new-build full-service in prime areas. Stable long-term leases account for ~80% of the rental market.

Phuket headline yields look higher (7 to 12% gross) but the net comes down to 4.5 to 6% after 20 to 30% operational drag · STR turnover, seasonality, higher mgmt fees. Net cash flow is meaningfully more variable.

Samui yields net 3.5 to 5.5% on leasehold villas, with 25 to 35% operational drag. Seasonal demand is more concentrated. Liquidity is thinner.

Liquidity · who buys when you sell

Bangkok foreign-quota resale pool is global and deep · 15,000+ unit transactions annually across foreign-friendly platforms. Multi-currency settlement is normal. Average sale 90 days at 95% list. The buyer pool spans HK, SG, Mainland China, Japan, Europe, US, ME.

Phuket is thinner · 5,000 to 7,000 foreign-friendly resales annually. Leasehold tenor compression (a 30-year lease with 10 years elapsed has 20 years remaining, deterring buyers) extends sales to 120 to 180 days at 85 to 90% list. Samui is acutely illiquid · under 2,000 foreign transactions a year.

What the numbers actually look like

Net of all of this

Bangkok's combination of freehold security, structural demand pull, deep liquidity, and zero company-structure risk produces 12 to 15% lower risk-adjusted return drag versus the islands. Phuket and Samui still work for buyers who specifically want a beach lifestyle as a primary residence. For a property that is meant to be an investment, Bangkok central full-service condos are the dominant trade in 2026.

We have full underwriting on 13 projects across central Bangkok. Talk to us for the deck.

Talk to us

Get the underwriting model.

We send the model + project shortlist by email. No spam, no pressure.